Last week, a Turkish parliamentarian submitted a proposal to the
Grand National Assembly of Turkey seeking condemnation of the Armenian
Genocide, a series of atrocities, and other acts of state terrorism.
In this document, Sebahat Tuncel, a member of the pro-Kurdish
Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), requests that President Erdogan
acknowledge and apologize in parliament for the Armenian Genocide,
massacres of Dersim, Marash, Sivas, and Chorum, mass hangings after the
Sept. 12, 1980 military coup, and other “crimes against humanity”
resulting from state terror.
The proposed resolution also demands that the Turkish president visit
one of the sites of the mass killings, repeat his apology in public,
and declare April 24 to be an official Day of Mourning. Within a year,
the parliament is to form a truth commission and make public all
documents in the state archives regarding these crimes. Moreover, the
resolution states, moral and material restitution should be provided to
descendants of the victims.
It is expected that the Turkish Parliament will reject consideration
of this proposal. Most probably, Tuncel’s real intent is to raise the
issue of the Armenian Genocide and other mass killings in parliament,
regardless of the outcome; the mere submission of such a resolution
would create a national uproar inside the parliament, the media, and
Turkish denialist circles. Tuncel must be aware that she is running the
risk of having her parliamentary immunity lifted and of being prosecuted
for bringing up banned subjects under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal
Code.
While welcoming Tuncel’s daring and bold proposal, Armenians, Turks,
Kurds, and others should not forget that this would not be the first
time the Turkish government has taken up the deportation and massacre of
Armenians. On Nov. 4, 1918, immediately after the collapse of the Young
Turk regime and before the founding of the Republic of Turkey by Kemal
Ataturk in 1923, the Ottoman Parliament considered a motion on the
crimes committed by the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP): “A
population of one million people guilty of nothing except belonging to
the Armenian nation were massacred and exterminated, including even
women and children.” Then- Minister of Interior Fethi Bey responded by
telling the parliament: “It is the intention of the government to cure
every single injustice done up until now, as far as the means allow, to
make possible the return to their homes of those sent into exile, and to
compensate for their material loss as far as possible.”
A Parliamentary Investigative Committee proceeded to collect relevant
documents describing the actions of those responsible for the mass
killings and turned them over to the Turkish Military Tribunal. The
CUP’s leading figures were found guilty of massacring Armenians and were
hanged or given lengthy prison sentences. The Military Tribunal
requested that Germany extradite to Turkey the masterminds of the
massacres who had fled the country. After German refusal, they were
tried in absentia and sentenced to death.
To reinforce her proposal with historical and legal precedents,
Tuncel may want to submit to the Turkish Parliament a copy of the 1918
parliamentary motion and discussion on the Armenian Genocide, which was
referred to at the time as “Armenian deportations and massacres.” She
should also submit a copy of the guilty verdicts issued by Turkish
Military Tribunals. Finally, Tuncel should remind the parliament of the
historic admission Kemal Ataturk made in an interview published in the
Los Angeles Examiner on Aug. 1, 1926: “These leftovers from the former
Young Turk Party who should have been made to account for the lives of
millions of our Christian subjects who were ruthlessly driven en masse
from their homes and massacred.” Would any Turkish parliamentarian dare
to call the father of Modern Turkey a liar?
Should the Turkish Parliament block Tuncel’s resolution and prevent
its consideration, it would expose the Erdogan government’s fear of
facing the truth, which leads it to conceal the guilt of its
predecessors! Regardless of the end result, this proposal is an
unexpected positive development on the eve of the Armenian Genocide
Centennial and provides some consolation to descendants of the victims
of more recent Turkish atrocities.
The introduction of Tuncel’s proposal to the Turkish Parliament
coincided with the unanimous recognition of the Armenian Genocide by
Bolivia’s Senate and Parliament. Significantly, this acknowledgment was
achieved on its own merits, without any Armenian lobbying efforts, which
negates the standard Turkish claim that countries that recognize the
Armenian Genocide do so under pressure from local Armenian communities.
Hardly any Armenians live in Bolivia!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment