Friday, December 21, 2018

The Economist Ranks Armenia ‘Country of the Year’

James Gillray’s ‘The Plum-Pudding in Danger’ (coloured engraving, 1805) Photo: Wikimedia Commons
A few days ago, a bunch of journalists at the Economist got together and decided, like kindergarten teachers doling out their ‘best student’ award, which of the world’s countries has ‘most improved’ in the last calendar year. In an article brimming with cynicism, they selected Armenia.
It appears the rise of Trump and Brexit have left an indelible mark on journalists in the West. As what were once dominant colonial powers become increasingly irrelevant in the geopolitical sphere—their social fabrics deteriorating to reveal the insidious foundations upon which their modern-day nation states were built—it must be difficult to watch small, unimportant nations like Armenia (and Malaysia, also a ‘contender’) reveal themselves to be modern day beacons of progress.
Or perhaps writers at the Economist need a break from their daily coverage of lit’rally everything. This article, which simply cahn’t be bothahd, is a great reminder as to the nonsensical role modern, globalized journalism has the potential to play in our daily lives. Lacking a unified community, writers for international publications write for seemingly everyone and yet, in an odd sort of way, for no one but themselves. Today, so much journalism is noncommittal, jaded, self-centered, and divorced from the collective and local human experience. Wasn’t this profession once born out of the need for communities to see themselves represented in pieces penned by those who understood them? Who or what community, one wonders, is the Economistrepresenting?
The issue is not the idea of international coverage. It’s that the robust circuit of local news which once supplemented that coverage is disappearing. Today, one is more likely to find cities and towns teeming with folks more concerned with saving hungry children in countries they’ll never visit than with fixing their own disintegrating local food economies. (Rural communities, it’s worth mentioning, are not so transfixed on what is occurring on an international scale, and they are condemned for it by their urban counterparts.) Oxford, where I went to school, is home to some of the world’s brightest individuals, many of whom are in training to ‘solve’ the world’s problems on a global scale. Meanwhile, the city is racked with poverty. On my last visit, I saw four separate instances of unconscious homeless individuals on the street being carted off by ambulances. Local problems are invisible in and to a globalist agenda. We are losing our innate and historical ability to discern that which is and isn’t within our sphere of influence, and journalists at major publications are responding by fabricating arbitrary and cynical awards out of thin air (which Alexis Ohanian, at least, appears thrilled about).
In any case, read the article for yourselves, and determine what is a suitable reaction. But for the record, when it comes to nations with the ‘tastiest food’ (which it was decided Armenia is not)… perhaps, rather than ranking the world’s cuisines, the Brits should just stick to stealing them.
Karine Vann

Karine Vann

Editor
Karine Vann is the editor of the Armenian Weekly. She is a musician who transitioned into journalism while living in the Caucasus for several years. Her work has appeared in Smithsonian.com, The New Food Economy, and a number of other publications. Her critical writings focus primarily on the politics of culture, media analyses, and the environment. She spends her spare time in front of a keyboard, at a farm, or making a fuss about zero waste. If you have comments, questions, pitches, or leads, she can be reached at karine@armenianweekly.com.

14 COMMENTS

  1. This commentary reveals more about the writer’s hate for the British than anything else. If The Economist was being elitist, Ms. Vann, you are being childish.
    • Agreed, the author demonstrates her bias toward Great Britain. Why did she study at Oxford? If so did she matriculate?
  2. I must admit that I could not understand Ms. Vann’s editorial’s *crux of the matter”. I was left with the impression that it was more about the sad state of journalism otherwise the Economist would not have picked Armenia as the as the ‘country of the year’ (quoting her). I am not a journalist, consequently I refrain from commenting on the state of ‘global’ journalism, after all, quoting her “Who or what community, one wonders, is the Economist representing?”. I guess the implication is that the “globalized” journalism surely does not represent the Armenian community. Did she mean to say Armenians in and outside Armenia or in the latter only? I am not sure.
  3. The world is literally (sic) yearning for examples of successful, and peaceful, democratic transitions out of authoritarianism, and at last Armenia and Armenians are attracting global attention for their leadership. I’m curious about what The Armenian Weekly and the author are trying to achieve with this article?
  4. ARMENIA HAS BEEN HOLY FOR CENTURIES
    ARMENIANS WERE FORCED TO MIGRATE
    BUT WHEREVER THEIR JOURNEY TOOK THEM;
    THEY PERSEVERED and
    CONTRIBUTED TO THE BETTERMENT OF THE WORLD.
  5. A little anybody knows that things in Armenia are now a lot worse than they were before the velvet revolution. Now we got bunch of square minded dogmatics that are absolutely incompetent and have no clue how to do their job. Not to mention that the previous administration had devostated the country to the point that it will take several generations to repair a third of the damage. I have given up on Armenia. There’s no hope for it.
  6. A den of professional thieves and criminals throws a bone to Armenians and everyone is excited? Typical self-destructive, politically illiterate Armenian behavior…
  7. How come I am not surprised that the ECONOMIST, the prima Donna western elitist paper picked Armenia as a result of the possible western move by the velvet revolution. The Economist is now just like the BBC a mouthpiece for Western anti-russian constant propaganda.
  8. Too many words and a little sense.
    More and more people around the world are trying to regain authority and leadership from politicians who are unable to control even their attitude, who are heading countries right
    into voids. France, Britain, USA, Russia… almost every country is in the list, everywhere people feel themselves betrayed and left by the government.
    I hope Armenia will be the first but not last in the toughest way of founding real democracy. Freedom is the most expensive capital for Armenia, for the world, and we are ready to pay for it any price.

No comments:

Post a Comment